Disposed

Roadsinh Pruthvisinh Chadana v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Mar 2024ABA/491/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application concerning a dispute over non-payment for goods supplied under Sections 402 and 406 IPC. With charge-sheet filed and interim protection operating since 23 February 2021, the Court made interim protection absolute subject to attendance at Thane Nagar Police Station on 28 March 2024 and court appearances.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection of 23 February 2021 made absolute, subject to presence at Thane Nagar Police Station on 28 March 2024 at 11:00 a.m. and court attendance on each date unless exempted.

Roadsinh Pruthvisinh Chadana Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

11 ABA 491 of 2021 (CR).doc

¶2

kishor

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 491 OF 2021

¶5

Roadsinh Pruthvisinh Chadana ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶6

Mr. Vikas Balasaheb Shivarkar, for Applicant. Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for State. Ms. Vaishali Vijay Sarvade, A.P.I. Thane Nagar P.S. present.

¶7

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 19 MARCH 2024.

¶8

P. C. :

¶9

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.41 of 2020 registered with Thane Nagar Police Station under Section 402 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Applicant was granted interim protection by Order dated 23 February 2021. It appears that the dispute between the Complainant and the Applicant is with regard to alleged failure of the Applicant to make payment in respect of goods supplied.

¶11

The learned APP submits that the charge-sheet against Applicant has already been filed. He however complains that after securing interim protection from this Court on 23 February 2021, Applicant has not bothered to remain present in police station even once. He would request that the Applicant be directed to present

¶12

Page No.1 of 2 19 March 2024

¶13

11 ABA 491 of 2021 (CR).doc

¶14

kishor

¶15

himself in the police station with a view to enable police to conduct further investigation, if necessary.

¶16

Mr. Shivarkar, the learned counsel appearing for Applicant assures the Court, after taking instructions from his client, that the Applicant shall remain present in the police station on the date and time fixed by the Court.

¶17

Since Applicant is already under interim protection as per order passed by this Court on 23 February 2021 and since charge-sheet has already been filed, in my view, the hearing of the present application need not to be deferred any further.

¶18

Accordingly, Interim protection granted by this Court on 23 February 2021 is made absolute subject to condition that the Applicant shall remain present before the Thane Nagar Police Station on 28 March 2024 at 11:00 a.m. and also subject to condition that the Applicant shall attend the Court of the learned Magistrate on each date, unless exempted. With the above directions the Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of.

¶19

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

¶20

Digitally signed KISHOR by KISHORVISHNU VISHNU KAMBLE KAMBLE Date:2024.03.21 18:27:04 +0530

¶21

Page No.2 of 2 19 March 2024

Roadsinh Pruthvisinh Chadana v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roadsinh Pruthvisinh Chadana v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Leopold Cafe Kamgar Sanghatana vs Leopold Cafe and Stores

Chandrakant Vadilal Shah Vs Smt. Leena Nitin Parekh

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors. Vs Green Fields Partnership Firm Pune Thr. Shriniwas G. Desai(Thr. Legal Heirs) Indira Shriniwas Desai

Percept Finserve Private Limited vs the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai

Shalini Dilip Gamre vs the Registrar, Bombay Hospital

Hanmantrao Yashwant Patil Vs General Manager, ( Employee and Industrial Relations Mah. State Road Transport ) Mumbai and Anr.