Anticipatory bail application. No one appeared for the applicant on two consecutive dates, so the application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
62-ABA-368-2021.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed bySHANTANU SHANTANUSHANKARSA SHANKARSADHUDUM DHUDUM Date: 2024.05.10 09:14:36 +0530
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 368 OF 2021
Nabilal Badeshah Shaikh ….Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent
None present for the Applicant. Smt. S. G. Talhar, APP, Advocate for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th MAY, 2024.
P.C. :
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
Nabilal Badeshah Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
