Pre-arrest bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel and perusing investigation papers, showed disinclination to grant bail; the applicant was permitted to withdraw the application, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:6534
24.aba.364.24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.364 OF 2024
(Vikrant s/o Vinayakrao Kapse Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. S. Sonwane, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.B. Jawade, APP for the State.
Mr. T.D. Mandlekar, Advocate for the complainant.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- JUNE 26, 2024
The application is for grant of pre-arrest bail.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
Vikrant s/o Vinayakrao Kapse
The State of Maharashtra
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
