In the absence of the applicant, the High Court accepted the acquittal statement that he was arrested in C.R.No.131 of 2023. The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application as infructuous based on this fact.
The anticipatory bail application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-aba-3619-23
Gokhale
1 of 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3619 OF 2023
Sudhir Narayan Mapuskar ..Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra..Respondent
None present for Applicant.
Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 05 JANUARY 2024
P.C. :
1.Nobody appears for the Applicant. However, learned
APP, on instructions, makes a positive statement that the applicant
is arrested in connection with C.R.No.131 of 2023, registered at
Azad Maidan police station, Mumbai, therefore, the anticipatory
bail application has become infructuous. The statement is recorded
and accepted.
2. Based on this statement, the present anticipatory bail
application is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2024.01.08 16:34:58 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be disposed of as infructuous due to the arrest of the applicant in C.R.No.131 of 2023.
Sudhir Narayan Mapuskar
State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court