Shankar Abhimanyu Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant was absent even on second call, despite the urgent nature of such an application.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant was absent even on second call, despite the urgent nature of such an application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910_ABA_3430_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3430 OF 2024
| Shankar Abhimanayu Gaikwad | … | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondent |
None for applicant. Mr. Mayur S. Sonavane, APP for respondent-State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 17th DECEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
(MANISH PITALE, J)
Priya Kambli
PRIYAKAMBLI Digitallysigned byPRIYA KAMBLIDate:2024.12.1717:29:47+0530
1/1
Shankar Abhimanayu Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court