Anticipatory bail application; after the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant relief, the applicant sought and obtained leave to withdraw the application, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-aba-3415-2024.docx
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.12.1414:17:20+0530
Mamta Kale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3415 of 2024
Rakesh S/o. Ramchandra Sawant … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr Pradyumna D Sharma a/w Mr Sandeep J Pawar, for the applicant.
Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for the respondent/ State.
PI Jadhav a/w PSI Gaikwad, Kalachowki Police Station, Mumbai, is present.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 14 December 2024.
P.C.:
. After hearing the matter for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant relief, the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for.
(R.N. Laddha, J.)
Page 1 of 1
14 December 2024
Rakesh S/o. Ramchandra Sawant
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
