Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC; the Court expressed disinclination to grant bail, and the applicant sought and obtained permission to withdraw the application, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:1333
28.aba.33.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.33 OF 2024
(Ananta Namdeo Ghogare Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. J.B. Gandhi, Advocate for the applicant.
Ms M.A. Barabde, APP for the State.
Mr. U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for non-applicant No.2.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 1, 2024
The application is for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ananta Namdeo Ghogare
State of Maharashtra
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
