Anticipatory bail application dismissed due to non-prosecution. The applicant was unrepresented, and no representative appeared for the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29-aba-287-2021.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 287 OF 2021
Aftab Shaikh Alam … Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
None for Applicant.
Smt. S.G.Talhar, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 4th APRIL, 2024.
P.C. :
1. None for the Applicant. 2. Even on earlier occasion, none had appeared for Applicant. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. .
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SONALI Digitally signedby SONALI SATISH SATISH KILAJEDate: 2024.04.05 KILAJE 16:24:41 +0530
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aftab Shaikh Alam
The State Of Maharashtra and Anr.
SHIVKUMAR DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court