Krishna Majhi v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought anticipatory bail but, on instructions, counsel withdrew the application. Leave granted and the application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.10.12 15:01:29 +0530
Chitra Sonawane 903-ABA-2790-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2790 of 2024
Krishna Majhi …... Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra …... Respondent.
Mr Mohd Shayan Usmani a/w Ahmad D. Siddiqui for the applicant.
Mr Amit Palkar, APP for respondent/State.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 11 October 2024.
P.C. :
Heard. Learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted as prayed for. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
[ R. N. Laddha,J. ]
Page No. 1 of 1 ____________________________________________ 11 October 2024.
Krishna Majhi
The State of Maharashtra
R.N.Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court