Anticipatory bail application disposed of by the Bombay High Court when the prosecution indicated no offence was registered and promised 72 hours prior notice before arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chitra Sonawane 905-ABA-2507-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2507 of 2024
Sumit Kumar Mahala …... Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra …... Respondent.
Mr Vishal Laxman Kolekar a/w Harsharaj Jagtap i/by Shubham Kadam for the applicant.
Mr Yogesh Dabke,APP for Respondent/State.
PSI Bipin Shinde, Sahar Police Station, is present.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 6 September 2024.
P.C. :
The learned APP, on instructions from the investigating officer present in the Court, informs the Court that no offence has been registered against the applicant and if the prosecution intends to arrest the applicant in the present crime, they will give him 72 hours prior notice. In view of this, the application stands disposed of.
[ R. N. Laddha,J. ]
Page No. 1 of 1 ____________________________________________ 6 September 2024.
Sumit Kumar Mahala
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
