court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail filed by the applicant in connection with serious offences, noting tactics to avoid arrest and noting a parallel application before the Sessions Court.
Application for anticipatory bail was dismissed in PRINCIPLE.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
`911_ABA_2133_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2133 OF 2024
Sunanda Mohan Bhute … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Vikrant V. Phatate for applicant.
Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, APP for respondent-State.
Mr. R. B. Chougule, H.C., Pandharpur Taluka Police Station, District Solapur Rural.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 04th SEPTEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
. This is an application filed on 29.07.2024 for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.0182 of 2024 dated 13.03.2024 registered at Pandharpur Taluka Police Station, District Solapur Rural for offences under Sections 370 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.
PRIYAKAMBLI Digitally signedby PRIYAKAMBLIDate:2024.09.0418:46:48+0530
1/2
`911_ABA_2133_24.doc
(MANISH PITALE, J)
Priya Kambli
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Section 370 IPC and IT (Prevention) Act, 1956.
Whether the conduct of the applicant justifies dismissal of the application.
Sunanda Mohan Bhute
The State of Maharashtra
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
