Allowed

Rahul Dattatray Chavan and Another v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Dec 2024ABA/2063/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge court granted leave to withdraw the application of first applicant. Regarding second applicant, found prima facie a civil dispute regarding unpaid money with no antecedents. Consequently, granted anticipatory bail conditioned on furnishing bond, attending police station, and cooperating with investigation, clarifying observations are limited to current order. Case quality is thin.

What did the court decide?

Apply for withdrawal of first applicant allowed. For second applicant, anticipatory bail granted upon furnishing PR bond of Rs. 20,000 with sureties, subject to conditions of attendance and non-tamper

Rahul Dattatray Chavan and Another Vs the… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:30352

¶2

¶3

2063.24ABA

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

919 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO.2063 OF 2024

¶6

1] RAHUL DATTATRAY CHAVAN

¶7

2] SAGAR @ AMOL S/O.DATTATRAY CHAVAN VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶9

Advocate for the applicants : Mr.Pratik A.Bhosle h/f. Adv.V.B.Kulkarni

¶10

APP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar

¶11

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 18.12.2024

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

¶14

2] The learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application of applicant no.1, namely, Rahul Dattatray Chavan.

¶15

3] Leave granted. Application of applicant no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

4] The applicant no. 2, namely, Sagar @ Amol s/o. Dattatray Chavan, is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.513/2024, registered with Amalner Police

¶17

¶18

2063.24ABA

¶19

Station, Tq. Amalner, District Jalgaon, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 504, 506 r/w. 34 of the IPC.

¶20

5] The allegations against the applicant no.2 are that the informant has paid Rs. 2 lakhs to the present applicant and the same is not paid back to the informant by the applicant no.2. Prima facie this could be a civil dispute. There are no antecedents against the present applicant no.2. In view of the same, the application is allowed in the following terms :

¶21

i] In the event the applicant no.2 is arrested in connection with Crime No.513/2024, registered with Amalner Police Station, Tq. Amalner, District Jalgaon, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 504, 506 r/w. 34 of the IPC, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

¶22

ii] The applicant no.2 shall attend the concerned police station as and when called by the investigating officer.

¶23

iii] The applicant no.2 shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶24

¶25

2063.24ABA

¶26

iv] The applicant no.2 shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

¶27

6] In the event, the applicant no.2 violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶28

7] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶29

8] The application stands disposed of.

¶30

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE

¶31

DDC

Rahul Dattatray Chavan and Another v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Dattatray Chavan and Another v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sampat Nemaram Darakwal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Gangankumar Baldevram Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Premnath Tukaram More Vs the Superintendent of Police and Another

Sachin Shivaji Mali vs the State of Maharashtra

Kartik Bhausaheb Gaikwad (Minor) through U.G His Father Bhausaheb Eknath Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Giridhar Baban Dube Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another