The Court confirmed the interim protection granted earlier to the applicant, who was already a beneficiary of anticipatory bail since September 2019, given that the investigation and chargesheet were complete.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
1-aba-1970-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1970 OF 2019
Naushad Jahangir Saiyed ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Kiran Varma i/b. Rajeev Sawant & Associates, for the Applicant.
Mr. Kiran Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Sachin Nikalje, Investigating Officer present.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 12 MARCH 2024
P.C.
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.03.1217:17:06+0530
. This present application is filed seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.I-57/2019 registered with Roha Police Station, Raigad for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code.
page 1 of 2
Mamta Kale
1-aba-1970-2019.doc
investigation into the crime are complete and that the chargesheet has already been filed.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application prayed for by the applicant in the given case deserves confirmation or revocation?
Naushad Jahangir Saiyed
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. LADDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
