Allowed

Sumandevi Satishkumar Agarwal and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC10 Apr 2024ABA/1914/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed anticipatory bail applications by making interim protection absolute. The decision relied on the restoration of the aggrieved company's name in revenue records, satisfying the complainant's grievance regarding land mutation. Bail was granted upon furnishing a bond and cooperation with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail applications allowed by making interim protection absolute; release on bail upon furnishing PR Bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or more sureties in like amount.

Sumandevi Satishkumar Agarwal and Anr. Vs the State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

4 aba 1913.21 +1 as.doc

¶2

k 1/3

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1913 OF 2021

¶5

Deepak Satishkumar Agarwal ....Applicant
V/S
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1914 OF 2021
Sumandevi Satishkumar Agarwal & Anr. ....Applicants
V/S
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents

¶6

Mr. Dhanraj A. Lodha i/b Mr. Ashish Verma for the Applicants.
Mr. Ashok S. Gawai, APPfor Respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Shahen Pradhan for Respondent No.2.

¶7

CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 10 APRIL 2024.

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

1These Applications are for grant of pre-arrest bail filed under
provisions of section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in connection
with Crime No.I-262 of 2021 for offences punishable under sections 420,
415, 417, 418, 423, 425, 426, 427, 463, 464, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120-B,
13, 199 and 200 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered
with Chhavani Police Station, Malegaon.

¶10

2The allegation against the Applicants is that the concerned land was
mutated in the name of M/s. Supreme Transports Organisation Private

¶11

katkam Page No. 1 of 3

¶12

k 2/34 aba 1913.21 +1 as.doc

¶13

Limited through Shri Satishkumar Kishanlala Agarwal and others. After
death of Satishkumar Kishanlala Agarwal, the Applicants got their
individual names mutated to the record of rights of the concerned land
vide Mutation Entry No.41509.

¶14

3That the Applicants have filed an Affidavit dated 9 April 2024
bringing on record 7/12 extract of land in question which now shows that
name of the Company Supreme Transport Organisation Private Limited
has been restored in revenue records. In that sense the grievance of the
Complainant is met with.

¶15

4The Applicants are on interim protection granted by this Court since
31 August 2021. Considering the fact that the name of the Company is
already restored in the revenue records, I am of the view that the interim
protection granted in favour of the Applicants needs to be made absolute.
The Anticipatory Bail Applications are accordingly allowed in terms of the
following order:

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

i)The Anticipatory Bail Applications are accordingly allowed by
making interim protection granted in favour of the Applicants by order
dated 31 August 2021 absolute.
ii)As such, in the event of arrest of the Applicants in Crime No.I-262
of 2021 registered with Chhavni Police Station, Malegaon for the offences
punishable under sections 420, 415, 417, 418, 423, 425, 426, 427, 463, 464,

¶18

katkam Page No. 2 of 3

¶19

k 3/34 aba 1913.21 +1 as.doc

¶20

466, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120-B, 13, 199 and 200 read with section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code, they shall be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in
the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.
iii)The Applicants shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer by
remaining present before the Investigating Officer whenever called.

¶21

5With the above directions, the Anticipatory Bail Applications are
disposed of.

¶22

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

¶23

Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2024.04.12 20:45:25 +0530

¶24

Page No. 3 of 3

¶25

katkam

Sumandevi Satishkumar Agarwal and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumandevi Satishkumar Agarwal and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Ramchandra Kasar Vs Priti Sunil Kasar

Kamal Chandru Badlani Vs Surendra Bhagchand Patel (Since Deceased through His Legal Heir)

Bhavyati Arvind Parekh vs Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Body

Leopold Cafe Kamgar Sanghatana vs Leopold Cafe and Stores

1. Smt. Halima Abdul Mulla. Vs 1. Salim Gulab Pathan

Gazdar Properties and Ors. Vs Mustafa Madrswalla and Ors.