Nikhil Shivaji Kadale v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What did the court decide?
leave to withdraw the application is granted; application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
leave to withdraw the application is granted; application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-ABA-168-24.DOC
Sayali Upasani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 168 OF 2024
Nikhil Shivaji Kadale ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI
Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2024.02.29 10:55:48 +0530
Ms. Neha R. Kokane, for Applicant.
Mrs. Geeta P. Mulekar, APP for State.
Mr. Niranjan Bhavke, for Intervener through VC with Mr. Sameer Tiwari.
CORAM:- N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATED:- 28th FEBRUARY, 2024.
PC:-
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
Leave granted.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Nikhil Shivaji Kadale
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court