Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application apprehending arrest for rape charges under the BHNS, 2023.held that the nature of the case requires custodial interrogation and no prima facie case for bail arose.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:26888
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
940 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1668 OF 2024
Bhushan @ Lala Vijay Jaiswal VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Other
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sonawane Sunita G. APP for Respondents-State: Mr. B. A. Shinde
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : November 14, 2024.
PER COURT :-
Page 1 of 2
940 ABA 1668-2024
investigation, the police noted that the victim’s clothes were removed from the room. Accordingly, additional sections for destruction of evidence were incorporated.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given the need for custodial interrogation and lack of preliminary investigation.
Whether the facts of this case warrant custodial interrogation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhushan @ Lala Vijay Jaiswal
The State Of Maharashtra
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
