The applicant sought leave to withdraw an anticipatory bail application. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 aba 1438.23 as.doc
k 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1438 OF 2023
Rakesh Kumar Nayak
....Applicant
V/S
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents
Mr. Vinod Thekkara for the Applicant.
Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Subir Sarkar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 11 MARCH 2024.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the Application. The Anticipatory Bail
Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2024.03.13 11:42:29 +0530
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
katkam Page No. 1 of 1 11 March 2024
Rakesh Kumar Nayak
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court