Applicants sought anticipatory bail; the Court showed disinclination to grant relief, and on instructions counsel for the applicants in both applications sought withdrawal, which was permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48+.odt
2024:BHC-AUG:25853
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1525 OF 2024
Raju Chotumiya Shaikh
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra
...
Mr. R. D. Khadap, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. C. V. Bhadane, APP for Respondents
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1370 OF 2024
Gopal Babruwan Lokhande And Antoher
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra
… *******
Mr. A. L. Kanade, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. C. V. Bhadane, APP for Respondents
CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:OCTOBER 21, 2024
PER COURT :
1.When this Court has shown its disinclination
to grant any relief, learned Counsels for Applicants in
both Applications, on instructions, seek withdrawal of
the Applications.
2.Applicationsstanddismissedas
withdrawn.
(R.M. JOSHI, J.)
Umesh
PAGE 1 OF 1
Raju Chotumiya Shaikh
The State Of Maharashtra
Gopal Babruwan Lokhande
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court