Anticipatory bail application argued on merits; court not inclined to grant relief, and the applicant sought leave to withdraw. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:5331
1 918-ABA-120-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 120 OF 2024
SAMADHAN DATTATRAYA PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. Pramod Kulkarni, Advocate h/f Mr. Maheshkumar S. Sonawane, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. A.R. Kale, APP for Respondents/State
Mr. M.G. Kochar, Advocate h/f Mr. Bharatkumar R. Warma, Advocate for Assist to APP
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. DATE : 12th MARCH, 2024
PER COURT :
not inclined to grant relief, learned advocate for applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
withdrawn.
(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Samadhan Dattatraya Patil
The State of Maharashtra
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
