Interim order condoning a delay in filing an application, with the court permitting necessary amendments to be carried out within two weeks. Decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chitra Sonawane 1 16(ii)IA-2146-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Interim Application No.2146 of 2023
In
Second Appeal No.1150 of 2005
1.Bhairu Krishnaji Bhintade
(deceased) through LRs,
1a) Indubai Bhairu Bhintade & Ors.
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
… Applicants.
Bhairu Krishnaji Bhintade & Ors.... Appellants.
Vs.
Abu Dagadu Bhintade & Ors.… Respondents.
Mr SP Thorat with Gurunath Walawalkar for applicants.
Mr SN Chandrachud, for respondents.
Coram: R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 21 February 2024.
P.C. :-
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing
the present application. For the reasons stated in the
application and the no objection from other side, delay of 3
months stands condoned. For the reasons stated in this
application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer
Chitra Sonawane 2 16(ii)IA-2146-23.doc
clauses (b) and (c). Necessary amendment be carried out
within two weeks from today, with an advance copy to be
served on the other side. The application is disposed of
accordingly.
[R. N. Laddha, J. ]
Bhairu Krishnaji Bhintade & Ors.
Bhairu Krishnaji Bhintade (deceased) through LRs, Indubai Bhairu Bhintade & Ors.
Abu Dagadu Bhintade & Ors.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court