One judge dismissed the execution applications and related notices for want of prosecution as neither applicant appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.04.08 10:38:54 +0530
1 36-N 104-18 in EXA 465-17 & other matters.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE NO.104 OF 2018
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.465 OF 2017
DTDC Express Ltd. (Earlier known as DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd.) … Claimant V/s. Bharti Enterprises … Respondent
AND
NOTICE NO.105 OF 2018
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2017
AND
NOTICE NO.106 OF 2018
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.467 OF 2017
AND
NOTICE NO.177 OF 2018
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.948 OF 2017
None for the Applicants.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 5TH APRIL 2024
Mugdha
1 of 2
2 36-N 104-18 in EXA 465-17 & other matters.doc
P.C. :
These Notices were on board today. Since none appeared for the
Applicants, the same are dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
2 of 2
Bharti Enterprises
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
