The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the matter had been resolved in the Small Causes Court, despite an initial listing for dismissal due to lack of appearance.
Petition disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-WP-986-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.986 OF 2018
HARBIN NAVINCHANDRA JHAVERI)
THROUGH C.A. SONAL H. JHAVERI)...PETITIONER
V/s.
MS. MANORAMA JAYANTILAL SHAH & OTHERS )...RESPONDENTS
Ms.Sonal Harbin Jhaveri (I8886), Constituted Attorney for the
Petitioner along with Petitioner, present in person.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:1st AUGUST 2023
P.C. :
1.This matter has been listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ as
none had been appearing for quite a while, and therefore, pursuant to
the order dated 18th July 2023, this matter has been listed for dismissal
today. However, when the matter is called out, Ms.Sonal H. Jhaveri,
stated to be the Constituted Attorney of the Petitioner, would submit
that the matter has been worked out in the Small Causes Court, and
therefore, states on instructions, that the Petition be disposed as
infructuous. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed as infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
avk 1/1
Harbin Navinchandra Jhaveri
Ms. Manorama Jayantilal Shah
Others
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court