A writ petition was dismissed for default when the petitioner failed to appear before the High Court for its final adjudication on the eighth date of listing.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
10 - WP 9555 OF 2018.doc
KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR
Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2023.08.11 11:02:41 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9555 OF 2018
Chandrakant Sitaram Chatorkar And Anr. ….. Petitioners
VERSUS
Chandrashekhar Vishwanath Ratkalkar (since Decd.) Through Lrs. And Ors.
….. Respondents
None for the Parties.
CORAM: ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2023
P.C:-
None appears for the petitioner. On 3rd August, 2023, following
order is passed :-
None for the parties. On 13th July, 2023, the following order is passed :-
KVM
2/2
10 - WP 9555 OF 2018.doc
nuisance and annoyance.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 to impugn the eviction decree should be dismissed due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chandrakant Sitaram Chatorkar And Anr.
Chandrashekhar Vishwanath Ratkalkar (since Decd.) Through Lrs. And Ors.
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
