Disposed

M/S. Milan Road Buildtech Llp-M/S Anish Infracon India Pvdt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Public Works Dept. (Nh) Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC7 Aug 2023WP/9541/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition challenging the rejection of a technical bid by directing the Evaluation Committee to consider the petitioner's previous representation and decide afresh.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Evaluation Committee to consider the petitioner's representation and take a fresh decision on the rejection of the technical bid.

M/S. Milan Road Buildtech Llp-M/S Anish… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

8-WP-9541-2023

¶2

Pdp

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 9541 OF 2023

¶5

M/s. Milan Road Buildtech LLP-M/s. Anish Infracon India Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

Public Works Department (NH) Govt. of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶8

Ms. Amruta Sawant for petitioners.

¶9

Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader a/w Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for respondent/State.

¶10

Mr. Pranil Sonawane a/w Ruchi Rajput a/w Raj Chaurasia for respondent nos.2 to 4.

¶11

CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

¶12

DATE: 7^th AUGUST, 2023

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

Heard Ms. Amruta Sawant, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. P. P. Kakade, learned Government Pleader representing the respondent no.1- State of Maharashtra and Mr. Pranil Sonawane, learned counsel representing the respondent nos.2 to 4 – Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Government of India.

¶15

This petition seeks to challenge the decision dated 24^th July, 2023, whereby the Evaluation Committee has rejected the technical bid submitted by the petitioner.

¶16

¶17

8-WP-9541-2023

¶18

Learned counsel representing the respondent nos.2 to 4 has stated, on instructions, that certain representations have been made by other tenderers, including the petitioner, which have been forwarded to the Evaluation Committee for consideration. He has also stated that along with representations preferred by other tenderers, the one made by the petitioner, shall also be considered by the Evaluation Committee.

¶19

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Evaluation Committee to consider the representation of the petitioner said to have been made by it against the decision dated 24^th July, 2023. The decision dated 24^th July, 2023, thus, shall be subject to the decision to be taken by the Evaluation Committee afresh.

¶20

We also provide that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the fresh decision to be taken by the Evaluation Committee, the petitioner will be at liberty to take recourse to legal remedies that may be available to it under law.

¶21

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶22

Digitally signed byPRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2023.08.07 17:47:03 +0530

¶23

M/S. Milan Road Buildtech Llp-M/S Anish Infracon India Pvdt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Public Works Dept. (Nh) Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Milan Road Buildtech Llp-M/S Anish Infracon India Pvdt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Public Works Dept. (Nh) Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Gajanan Enterprises Vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and Anr.

Shree Gajanan Enterprises Vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and Anr.

Oscar Infrastructure Private Limited and Another Vs Aparna Jagdish Wagh and Others

Aditya Birla Finance Limited vs Rnp Tradex LLP

Labh Singh Daya Singh vs Kurian Thomas and 2 Ors.

Omsainath Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor Vs Divisional Railway Manager, Centralrailway