The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a possession warrant. It granted the petitioners one month to vacate the suit premises instead of interfering with the impugned order, pending an undertaking.
One month time granted to vacate premises; possession warrant kept in abeyance till 31st August 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-WP-9486-2023
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9486 OF 2023
Akhtarunnisa Salamatullah Kidwai And Others Petitioners
Versus
Sultuana Farzandali And Others Respondents
Mr. G.R. Syed, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. C.C. Deshpande, Advocate for the respondents.
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
DATE : 3rd AUGUST, 2023
ORDER :
Bhagyawant Punde
{2} 907-WP-9486-2023
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
Bhagyawant Punde
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the issuance of a possession warrant in an execution matter considering the petitioners' plea for time to vacate.
Akhtarunnisa Salamatullah Kidwai
Sultuana Farzandali
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
