Disposed

Rajeev Jagdish Narang and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC21 Apr 2023WP/920/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Writ Petition filed seeking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. Petitioners admitted an alternate remedy existed under Section 227 CrPC. Court granted liberty to pursue that remedy and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave and liberty granted to avail alternate remedy under Section 227 CrPC; Petition disposed off as withdrawn.

Rajeev Jagdish Narang and Anr. Vs the State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

SLJ

¶2

17-WP-920-2022.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 920 OF 2022

¶6

Rajeev Jagdish Narang And Anr. ...Petitioners
V/s.

¶7

The State Of Maharashtra & Anr....Respondents

¶8

Mr. Girish Kulkarni, Senior Advocate i/by Ms. Mrunmai Kulkarni for
Petitioners.

¶9

Mr. Ajay Patil, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1-State.

¶10

Ms. Iram Memon for Respondent No.2.

¶11

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 21^st APRIL 2023.

¶13

P.C.:-

¶14

.Mr. Kulkarni, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners on

¶15

instructions submitted that, admittedly in the present case, Police have
submitted charge-sheet after completing of investigation and the said case
has now been committed to the Court of Sessions being Sessions Case
No.287 of 2023.

¶16

2.In view thereof, the Petitioners are having alternate remedy by way of
filing of an Application under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. for discharge and
without availing such a remedy, Petitioners have directly approached this
Court by invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India.

¶17

Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date: 2023.04.26 14:51:40 +0530

¶18

1/2

¶19

17-WP-920-2022.doc

¶20

3. Mr. Kulkarni, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners therefore on instructions seeks leave to withdraw present Petition with liberty to avail the said alternate remedy as contemplated under the provisions of Cr.P.C.

¶21

Leave and liberty granted.

¶22

4. Petition is disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

¶23

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

¶24

2/2

Rajeev Jagdish Narang and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeev Jagdish Narang and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prince Kumar Rajendra Yadav and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sameer Roshan Khan and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Yasin Abdul Khan Vs Sr. Inspector of Police and Anr.

Sameerkumar Prakash Awasare Vs State of Maharashtra

Shashikant Bhagwandas Bhayani Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Borivali Police Station and Anr.

Raju Iqbal Mulani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.