Hearing of an application seeking leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, which was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the Writ Petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31. civil wp 878-23.doc
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 878 OF 2023
Madhavi Madhavrao Rajebahadur
(since deceased) through Legal Heirs Radhika Trigun Gosavi & Anr.
.. Petitioners
Versus
Dhanashri N. Kotwal @ Dhananshri Narayan Rajebahadur & Ors.
.. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 23, 2023
P.C.:
1. Mr. Shinde, learned Advocate for Petitioners seeks leave to
withdraw the present Writ Petition.
2. Leave granted. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by RAVINDRA RAVINDRAMOHANAMBERKAR MOHANAMBERKARDate:2023.01.24 15:30:09 +0530
1 of 1
Radhika Trigun Gosavi & Anr.
Dhanashri N. Kotwal @ Dhananshri Narayan Rajebahadur & Ors.
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
