The High Court at Aurangabad directed respondent no. 3 to consider the petitioners' claim for difference in dearness allowance based on a 2018 communication within six weeks.
The respondent no. 3 directed to take appropriate decision within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
936 WRIT PETITION NO.8644 OF 2023
MILIND ROHIDAS BAISANE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for petitioners : Mr. Wagh Mukulanand R. AGP for the respondent – State : Mr. S.G. Sangle Advocate for respondents 3 to 5 : Mr. P.S. Patil
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 20 JULY 2023
PC :
Petitioners are awaiting the difference in the dearness
allowance pursuant to the communication dated 16-02-2018 between the respondents 3 and 5.
2. We have heard both the sides.
no. 3 to take appropriate decision on the communication mentioned hereinabove as expeditiously as possible and in any case within six weeks.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should be directed to decide the petitioners' pending entitlement to difference in dearness allowance within six weeks.
Milind Rohidas Baisane and Others
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
Shailesh P. Brahme
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
