Single-judge high court order disposing of a writ petition by directing respondent to decide a pending revision application within six weeks.
Direction to respondent No.1 to decide Revision Application No.168 of 2022 within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8601 OF 2022
Mayur Damji Satra...Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors...Respondents.
Mr. Sumit S. Kate for Petitioner.
Mr. P.P. Pujari, AGP for Respondent.
Coram : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : March 17, 2023.
P. C. :
1.As the impugned order is an interlocutory order, the writ
petition can be conveniently disposed of by issuing directions to
respondent No.1 to decide the revision application preferred by the
petitioner, being Revision Application No.168 of 2022, within a period of
six weeks from today.
2.The petitioner to attend the office of respondent No.1 on 28th
March 2023 at 11.00 a.m. after giving notice to respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Digitally signed patilsr by SACHIN SACHIN RAMCHANDRA RAMCHANDRA PATIL PATIL Date: 2023.03.20 16:01:34 +0530
1 / 2
3. Respondent no.1 is directed to decide Revision Application No.
168 of 2022 within a period of six weeks from today.
4. Writ petition stands disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
2 / 2
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to the respondent to decide the pending revision application.
Mayur Damji Satra
The State of Maharashtra
Ors
SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court