Dnyaneshwar Bajirao Darwatkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of two connected writ petitions and an interim application after counsel moved for withdrawal. The Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissed the petitions, and consequently dismissed the interim applications. No substantive legal principles were evolved.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of petitions allowed; Writ petitions and Interim Application dismissed.
What the court decided
Chitra Sonawane 5-WP-4626-2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4626 OF 2013
Nilima R. Rao & Ors.…...Petitioners.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.…...Respondents.
A/W
WRIT PETITION NO.860 OF 2014
Dnyaneshwar Bajirao Darwatkar
Vs.
…Petitioner.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.…Respondents.
A/W
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3140 OF 2021
IN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether writ petitions and interim applications are to be allowed when petitioners seek withdrawal.
Whether dismissed petitions render associated interim applications liable to dismissal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nilima R. Rao & Ors.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- petitioner
Dnyaneshwar Bajirao Darwatkar
- applicant
Prakash S. Hebbar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court