A petitioner in this writ petition attempted to withdraw the petition to approach the statutory authority under the Maharashtra Money Lending Act. The Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition and approach the statutory forum granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 WRIT PETITION NO.8502 OF 2023
YOGIRAJ VISHWANATH MULE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Mr.N.R.Thorat h/f Mr.R.D.Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr.V.M.Kagne, AGP for the Respondent/State.
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.)
DATE : JULY 19, 2023
PER COURT:
1.This petition is preferred directly in this Court, only for the
reason that the impugned order is passed hurriedly. This cannot be a
reason to avoid approaching a forum which is a statutory remedy, in
accordance with the scheme laid down under the Maharashtra Money
Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 and the Rules thereunder.
2.The learned Advocate for the Petitioners seeks leave to
withdraw this petition and approach the statutory authority.
3.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
khs/July 2023/8502
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be allowed when the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw it and approach the statutory forum.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yogiraj Vishwanath Mule
State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court