The petitioner challenged the lower court's order allowing a defendant to contest a suit on merits after affording liberty to lead evidence. The High Court exercised jurisdiction under Article 227 but declined to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8476 OF 2023
Shankar Sidramappa Patil ...Petitioner
Versus
Chandrakant Sidramappa Patil and Another
..Respondents
Mr. Ajit V. Alange for the Petitioner.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : 13th July , 2023.
P. C. :
1 of 2
PMB
interest of justice, in my opinion, the Defendant No.1 should be permitted to contest the suit on merits.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
2 of 2
PMB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the lower court's order permitting a defendant to lead evidence after the plaintiff's evidence was completed.
Shankar Sidramappa Patil
Chandrakant Sidramappa Patil
Another
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
