High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions for want of prosecution due to absence and lack of interest by the petitioners.
Writ petitions dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-wp-844-2007.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.844 OF 2007 WITH
VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR
Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2023.07.11 10:36:52 +0530
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.30 OF 2019 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.846 OF 2007
WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.28 OF 2019 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.845 OF 2007 WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.29 OF 2019 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.848 OF 2007
Prerana Thakore and Others ...Petitioners
vs.
Jitendra Prasad Pandey and Others ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Madhav Sapre, for Respondent No.1 in WP.No. 846/ 2007. Mr. Jitendra Pandey, for Respondent No.1 in WP.No. 844/2007.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : JULY 10, 2023
P.C.:
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Vishal Parekar
...1
Vishal Subhash Parekar
Prerana Thakore
Jitendra Prasad Pandey
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
