The Court disposed of the Writ Petition after recording that the parties had settled the matter amicably outside the Court by executing Consent Terms.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP-836-2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.836 OF 2012
Sapan Pramod Choudhury ...Petitioner Versus Dinesh Dashrath Patil & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.K.S. Dubey, for the Petitioner.
NILAM Digitally signed byNILAM SANTOSH SANTOSH KAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2023.04.1317:56:19 +0530
Mr.Balasheb Deshmukh, for Respondent No.1. Ms.Mrumayi Khambete i/b Mr.Pravartak Pathak, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Mr.S.K. Dhekale, Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay present.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 13 APRIL 2023
P.C:-
. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondents.
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2
902-WP-836-2012.doc
Terms is placed on record it is taken on record and marked as Article ‘X”.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2
Sapan Pramod Choudhury
Dinesh Dashrath Patil & Ors.
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
