Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition regarding the departmental process for pension. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 26 wp 834.21 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.834 OF 2021
Yashwant Ganpat Amrute V/S
....Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Kamalakar L. Koli for the Petitioner. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 6-State.
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 20 MARCH 2023.
P.C.:
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions submits that the Department has started the process of pension as such seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2023.03.23 13:29:11 +0530
1/1
katkam
Yashwant Ganpat Amrute
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
