This is a default dismissal of a writ petition in the Bombay High Court as the petitioner had no representation and appeared to have lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 21 wp 8310.16 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8310 OF 2016
Narendra Maruthi Nagraj ....PETITIONER V/S Nagamma Nagraj (since deceased) & Ors. ....RESPONDENTS …
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2023.
P.C.:
None appears for the Petitioner. Even on the last occasion also, none had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed for default.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
1/1
katkam
Narendra Maruthi Nagraj
Nagamma Nagraj
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
