Writ petition dismissed. Single-judge High Court held that appellate interference in a trial court's exercise of discretion to allow document production is not called for unless the order is perverse.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-wp8290-2022.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8290 OF 2022
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2023.12.06 15:25:51 +0530
Dilip Manohar Deshpande & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. Sudhir Nilkant Deshpande & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Abhijit Mahadevrao Adagule for the petitioners.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 6, 2023
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV
DILIP MANOHAR DESHPANDE & ORS.
SUDHIR NILKANT DESHPANDE & ANR.
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
