The court disposed of Writ Petition No.8154 of 2019 and connected Interim Application as infructuous following an order by the Revenue Minister under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1948, rendering no questions for consideration.
Writ Petition and Interim Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-wp-8154-2019.doc
Sonali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8154 OF 2019 WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.14807 OF 2023
Laxman Jijaba Tanapure...Petitioner
Versus
Yeshwant Rekhuji Jadhav (since deceased)
through legal heirs
Shantaram Yeshwant Jadhav & Ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Rajeshwari Patwardhan, for the Petitioner/Applicant.
Ms. Bhavana Punalekar h/f. Ms. Shakuntala Wadekar, for Respondent
Nos.2 and 3.
Mr. Vilas B. Tapkir, for Respondent Nos.8, 10, 11, 12, 16 and 17.
Mrs. M. S. Srivastava, AGP, for the State.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 29th NOVEMBER 2023
P.C.:
1.Ms. Rajeshwari Patwardhan, learned counsel appearing for the
Petitioner states that the Writ Petition has become infructuous in view
of the subsequent order dated 29th August 2019 passed by the
Hon’ble Revenue Minister in the proceedings filed under Section
48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1948. Accordingly, the Writ
1/2
903-wp-8154-2019.doc
Sonali
Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
2. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing survives in
the Interim Application and the same is accordingly disposed of. 2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laxman Jijaba Tanapure
Shantaram Yeshwant Jadhav
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court