Writ petition seeking stay on implementation of an order was disposed of after respondents indicated they would seek ministerial bone fide delay condonation; hearing fixed for the minister.
Writ Petition disposed of with no order as to costs; relief not pressed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
924-wp-8128-2023.doc
Sonali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8128 OF 2023
Vikram Auto Services & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Y. S. Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Aneesha Munshi, Ms. Palak Jain I/b. Divya Shah Associates, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Atul Damle, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Payal Vardhan, S. N. Algur, Ms. Saloni Vyas I/b. Argus Partners, for Respondent No.2.
Mr. S. H. Kankal, AGP, for the State/Respondent No.1.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 7th SEPTEMBER 2023
P.C. :
1/3
924-wp-8128-2023.doc
Sonali
condonation application.
2/3
924-wp-8128-2023.doc
Sonali
of the case and all the contentions of both the parties on merits
are expressly kept open.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
3/3
Vikram Auto Services & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
