Allowed

Shahbabu Education Society, Patur, Akola Thr. Secretary, Syed Ishaque Syed Nabi and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC9 Nov 2023WP/7688/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking approval for appointment of a Junior Clerk. Court directed respondent to reconsider the rejected proposal de novo after petitioners removed deficiencies within four weeks. No costs.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to reconsider the appointment proposal dated 9/6/2020 afresh within four weeks of receiving the judgment copy.

WRIT PETITION NO.7688 OF 2023 1)Shahbabu Education Society, Patur, District Akola, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 having Registration No.F-67 AKL, through its Secretary Mr. Syed Ishaque Syed Nabi, aged about 74 years, occupation : retired. 2)Shahbabu Urdu High School, Patur, District Akola, through its Head Master – Mr. Mujibullah Khan, aged about 50 years, 3)Mr. Mohd. Wasif Mohd. Hudain, aged about 32 years, occupation : service (working as Clerk) in Shahbabu Urdu High School, Patur, District Akola (Maharashtra State)....Petitioners - Versus - 1)State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, School Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 032. 2)Director of Education (Secondary & Higher Secondary), Maharashtra State, Pune. 3)Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Akola. ...Respondents

2)The petitioner nos.1 and 2 sought approval to the appointment of the petitioner no.3 on the post of Junior Clerk. The said proposal came to be rejected on 9/11/2020 pointing out various deficiencies in the said proposal. According to the petitioners, on 24/11/2020 the said deficiencies have been removed. Thereafter request has been made to consider the aforesaid proposal since the deficiencies stood removed. The reminders are dated 28/1/2021 and 5/4/2021. Since no steps were taken, the final reminder dated 6/3/2023 was issued to the respondent no.3 Education Officer (Secondary).

3)In these facts, since the petitioners seek re-consideration of the proposal by urging that all the deficiencies have been removed, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent no.3 Education Officer (Secondary) to consider the proposal dated 9/6/2020 afresh in the

light of the stand taken by the petitioners that all the deficiencies have been removed. The same be re-considered within a period of four weeks of receiving copy of this judgment. The decision taken be communicated to the petitioners.

Shahbabu Education Society, Patur, Akola Thr. Secretary, Syed Ishaque Syed Nabi and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahbabu Education Society, Patur, Akola Thr. Secretary, Syed Ishaque Syed Nabi and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manora Shikshan Sanstha, Manora Thr. Jt. Secretary, Dr. Sanjay C. Rothe Vs Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Motiram S/O Moreshwar Mohadikar Vs Joint Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Tirupati Urban Co. Operative Bank Ltd, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ram G. Diwakar Vs Shri Rajendra Nikam, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing

Smt. Bharti D/O. Manohar Sherkar @ Sau. Bharti W/O. Giridhar Deogade Vs the S. T., Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Division Thr. Member Secretary, Nagpur

Smt. Bharti D/O. Manohar Sherkar @ Sau. Bharti W/O. Giridhar Deogade Vs the Additional Collector, Nagpur and Others

Mukesh Kumar Vs Union of India, Thr. the Director General, Railway Police Force, New Delhi and Others