Disposed

Sau. Sushma Sharadrao Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry for General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Another

Bombay HC9 Nov 2023WP/7687/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Auxiliary Nurse Midwife Sushma Sharadrao Kulkarni wrote to Zilla Parishad, Akola seeking second time-bound promotion benefit. As the representation remained pending, the Court directed the Chief Executive Officer to consider it within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola to consider the representation dated 19/7/2022 and render a decision within six weeks.

Sau. Sushma Sharadrao Kulkarni Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-NAG:16429-DB

¶2

1 25-WP-7687-2023.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 7687 OF 2023

¶5

(Sau. Sushma Sharadrao Kulkarni Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Shri D.S. Patil, Counsel for the petitioner.
Ms N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1.

¶8

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 9, 2023

¶9

Considering the nature of directions proposed to be issued, notice to
respondent no.2 is dispensed with. The learned Assistant Government Pleader
waives notice for respondent no.1.

¶10

2]The petitioner who was employed as Auxiliary Nurse Midwife with Zilla
Parishad, Akola claims entitlement to the second time bound promotion benefit
having received the first benefit after completion of twelve years of service. Since
the petitioner did not receive this benefit, she approached the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola by filing representation dated 19/7/2022.

¶11

3]Since the aforesaid representation is still pending, the Writ Petition is
disposed of by passing the following order :

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola to consider the
representation dated 19/7/2022 in accordance with law. The petitioner shall
serve copy of this order on respondent no.2. After receiving the said order, a
decision on the representation be taken within a period of six weeks. The
decision taken be communicated to the petitioner.

¶14

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶15

SUMIT

Sau. Sushma Sharadrao Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry for General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Sushma Sharadrao Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry for General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manora Shikshan Sanstha, Manora Thr. Jt. Secretary, Dr. Sanjay C. Rothe Vs Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Motiram S/O Moreshwar Mohadikar Vs Joint Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Tirupati Urban Co. Operative Bank Ltd, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ram G. Diwakar Vs Shri Rajendra Nikam, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing

Smt. Bharti D/O. Manohar Sherkar @ Sau. Bharti W/O. Giridhar Deogade Vs the S. T., Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Division Thr. Member Secretary, Nagpur

Smt. Bharti D/O. Manohar Sherkar @ Sau. Bharti W/O. Giridhar Deogade Vs the Additional Collector, Nagpur and Others

Mukesh Kumar Vs Union of India, Thr. the Director General, Railway Police Force, New Delhi and Others