Disposed

Smt. Shobha Gunvantrao Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry for General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Another

Bombay HC9 Nov 2023WP/7659/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, an Auxiliary Nurse Midwife, sought benefits pending on time-bound promotion representations against Zilla Parishad. The court dispensed with notice, ordering the CEO to decide the representations within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, to decide pending representations within six weeks.

Smt. Shobha Gunvantrao Deshmukh Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-NAG:16428-DB

¶2

1 15-WP-7659-2023.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 7659 OF 2023

¶5

(Smt. Shobha Gunvantrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Shri D.S. Patil, Counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

Shri H.D. Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 9, 2023

¶10

Considering the nature of directions proposed to be issued, notice to
respondent no.2 is dispensed with. The learned Assistant Government Pleader
waives notice for respondent no.1.

¶11

2]The petitioner who was employed as Auxiliary Nurse Midwife with Zilla
Parishad, Akola claims entitlement to the second time bound promotion benefit
having received the first benefit after completion of twelve years of service. Since
the petitioner did not receive this benefit, she approached the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola by filing representations dated 23/12/2020 and
4/7/2022.

¶12

3]Since the aforesaid representations are still pending, the Writ Petition is
disposed of by passing the following order :

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Akola to consider the
representations dated 23/12/2020 and 4/7/2022 in accordance with law. The
petitioner shall serve copy of this order on respondent no.2. After receiving the
said order, a decision on the representations be taken within a period of six
weeks. The decision taken be communicated to the petitioner.

¶15

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶16

SUMIT

Smt. Shobha Gunvantrao Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry for General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Shobha Gunvantrao Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry for General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manora Shikshan Sanstha, Manora Thr. Jt. Secretary, Dr. Sanjay C. Rothe Vs Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Motiram S/O Moreshwar Mohadikar Vs Joint Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Tirupati Urban Co. Operative Bank Ltd, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ram G. Diwakar Vs Shri Rajendra Nikam, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing

Smt. Bharti D/O. Manohar Sherkar @ Sau. Bharti W/O. Giridhar Deogade Vs the S. T., Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Division Thr. Member Secretary, Nagpur

Smt. Bharti D/O. Manohar Sherkar @ Sau. Bharti W/O. Giridhar Deogade Vs the Additional Collector, Nagpur and Others

Mukesh Kumar Vs Union of India, Thr. the Director General, Railway Police Force, New Delhi and Others