which the petitioner was the Principal, is a college conducted by the University within the meaning of section 2(2) of the Act of 2016 and is not an affiliated college as defined under section 2(3) of the Act. The college being a college conducted by the university, the Government resolution dated 05.03.2011 issued by the Higher and Technical Education Department was not applicable. Even otherwise, by virtue of that very Government Resolution, it was incumbent for the person holding the post of Principal to obtain certificate from the Government Medical Committee three months before the date of superannuation about mental and physical fitness. There was requirement of the qualification of Ph.D. or equivalent degree, even the confidential reports of the last five years were relevant. Since it was continuation beyond the age of 60 years it could not have been without performance appraisal. Therefore, even if it is assumed that the Government Resolution dated 05.03.2011 was applicable, for want of such compliances, since the petitioner’s date of superannuation was 09.12.2017, the petition having been filed thereafter on 06.07.2018, she is not entitled to seek any relief.
