This judgment records a written order where the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed byMUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2023.08.04 10:05:59 +0530
1 18-WP 7601-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7601 OF 2023
Amrut Enterprises & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar, Senior Counsel a/w A. S. Pandire for the Petitioners.
Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Ram S. Apte a/w Mr. Narayan S. Bubna and Mr. Harshal P. Nahata for Respondent Nos.2 to 4-Corporation.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 03rd AUGUST 2023
P.C. :
Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners, learned AGP for the Respondent-State and learned Counsel representing Respondent Nos.2 to 4-Thane Municipal Corporation.
1 of 2
Mugdha
2 18-WP 7601-23.doc
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
Mugdha
Amrut Enterprises & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra, Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department
Thane Municipal Corporation
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
