Disposed

Manohar Aappanna Dharanguttikar and Ors. v. District Deputy Registrar Co-Op. Soc. Kolhapur and Ors.

Bombay HC6 Sept 2023WP/7380/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Bench granted leave to implead the State Co-operative Election Authority as Respondent No. 2A. Due to that authority's subsequent order, the court disposed of the petition without deciding merits on reliefs, granting liberty to file a fresh petition on the remaining issues.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to implead State Co-operative Election Authority; Writ Petition disposed; liberty granted to file fresh petition on remaining prayers.

Manohar Aappanna Dharanguttikar and Ors. Vs District Deputy… — Election Law | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-AS:26457

¶2

WP 7380-2023.doc

¶3

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 7380 OF 2023

¶5

Manohar Aapanna Dharanguttikar & ors. .Petitioners

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative .Respondents Societies, Kolhapur & ors.

¶8

Mr. Surel S. Shah i/b. Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, Advocate, for the Petitioners

¶9

Smt. M. S. Srivastava, AGP, for the Respondent – State Mr. A. B. Tajane, Advocate, for Respondent No. 3

¶10

Mr. P. D. Pise i/b. P. Padmanabh & Associates, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 4 to 15

¶11

Mr. Deelip Patil Bankar for Chief Standing Counsel SCEA, for Respondent No. 2

¶12

P. C.

¶13

At the outset, Mr. Shah, learned counsel appearing for

¶14

the Petitioners seeks leave to implead the State Co-operative

¶15

Election Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune as party Respondent No. 2A to the Petition. Leave as prayed for is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Re-verifcation is dispensed with.

¶16

Heard Mr. Shah, learned counsel appearing for the

¶17

Petitioners, Smt. Srivastava, learned AGP, for the Respondent –

¶18

1 of 3

¶19

WP 7380-2023.doc

¶20

State, Mr. Deelip Patil Bankar, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 and Mr. Pise, learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 4 to 15.

¶21

Mr. Deelip Patil Bankar, learned counsel appearing for the newly added Respondent No. 2A produces letter dated 06.09.2023 of the State Co-operative Election Authority, Pune.

¶22

Mr. Shah, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that in view of the order dated 06.09.2023 passed by the Respondent No. 2A – State Co-operative Election Authority, Pune, the relief sought in terms of prayer clause (b) does not survive. He states that insofar as prayer clause (c) is concerned, liberty be granted to fle a fresh Petition.

¶23

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as nothing survives insofar prayer clause (b) is concerned. Liberty is granted to fle a fresh Petition with respect to prayer clause (c) of the Petition.

¶24

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs. It is made clear that all the

¶25

2 of 3

¶26

WP 7380-2023.doc

¶27

contentions of both parties on merits are expressly kept open.

¶28

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)

¶29

3 of 3

Manohar Aappanna Dharanguttikar and Ors. v. District Deputy Registrar Co-Op. Soc. Kolhapur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manohar Aappanna Dharanguttikar and Ors. v. District Deputy Registrar Co-Op. Soc. Kolhapur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vitthal D Mhaske and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Co. Op Dept and Ors.

Rajiya Aadamshaffi Mulla Vs Manoj Jalindar Dhanavde and Ors.

Rukmini Chandrakant Kumbhar Vs Sitabai Ramchandra Kalamkar and Anr.

Shri. Vinayak Raghunath Sule (Since Decd.) through Lrs. Vs Sau. Sharada Krishna Chimne and Ors.

Dattatraya Ratnappa Chavan and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dattatraya Ratnappa Chavan and Others Vs the Additional Collector, Kolhapur