Two writ petitions filed by individuals against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai were disposed of upon the petitioners seeking and obtaining permission to withdraw them. No costs were awarded.
Leave to withdraw the petitions was allowed; the petitions were dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
502-WP.5637.2018.doc
TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI
Digitally signed by TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2023.11.08 15:55:51 +0530
Tauseef
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5637 OF 2018
Dayanand Bapurao Howal ...Petitioner
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of Greater
Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7277 OF 2018
Pradeep Sadhu Sonawale...Petitioner
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of Greater
Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents
********
Mr. Jitendra Gaikwad for the Petitioner.
********
CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI, JITENDRA JAIN, J.J. DATE : 7th NOVEMBER, 2023.
P.C.
. Not on board, upon mentioning on production board.2. In view of the communication as received by the learned
Advocate for the Petitioner dated 27th October 2023, learned counsel for
the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Allowed to be
withdrawn.
3. Disposed of. No costs.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.]
[G. S. KULKARNI, J.]
1 of 1
Dayanand Bapurao Howal
Pradeep Sadhu Sonawale
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
G. S. KULKARNI
JITENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court