This writ petition challenging the rejection of a compassionate appointment application was disposed of by allowing the plea and granting liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Petition disposed of with liberty to approach Central Administrative Tribunal; all contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.7215.21-WP.docx
Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ BASAVRAJ GURAPPA GURAPPA PATIL PATIL Date: 2023.01.02 17:34:51 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7215 OF 2021
Prakash Vishwas Kedar
….. Petitioner
Vs.
The Union of India & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Sachin Gite for the Petitioner
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : JANUARY 2, 2023
P.C.
2 It is not disputed by the learned Advocate, that the Central Administrative Tribunal would also exercise its jurisdiction, however, the learned Advocate submits that no reasons are given while rejecting the Application.
1/2
Mohite
1.7215.21-WP.docx
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Mohite
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the compassionate appointment application due to financial condition warrants intervention by the High Court.
Whether the Petitioner is entitled to appointment on compassionate grounds in view of lack of reasons.
Prakash Vishwas Kedar
The Union of India
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
