Bharati Uttamchand Jain and Anr. Vs Neha Vijay Malik and Ors.

1. It is not necessary for this Court to go into the merits of the case in view of the consensus which has been fairly arrived by learned counsel for the parties that the interim compensation be fixed at Rs. 16,500/- per month.

¶11

2. In view of the above, sub-clause (i) and (ii) of clause No. 2 in the order of the order dated 17^th April, 2023 is modified to read as under:

¶12

(i) The Appellants shall deposit in the Court compensation in respect of suit premises @ Rs. 16,500/- (Rupees Sixteen Thousand Five Hundred only) per month for the period from the date of Decree till 30.04.2023 in four equal installments on 30^th December, 2023, 31^st January, 2024, 28^th

¶13

1

¶14

17-WP-7009-2023.doc

¶15

February, 2024 and 31^st March, 2024 by deducting already deposited amount.

¶16

(ii) The Appellants shall continue to deposit in the Court compensation of Disputed premises @ Rs. 16,500/- (Rupees Sixteen Thousand Five Hundred only) per month till disposal of the appeal on or before 15^th day of each succeeding month.

¶17

3. Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶18

(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )

¶19

2

Bharati Uttamchand Jain and Anr. v. Neha Vijay Malik and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharati Uttamchand Jain and Anr. v. Neha Vijay Malik and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Udayraj Paras Gaud and Anr. Vs Rambaschan Pabbar Gaud and Anr.

Jignesh Maganlal Kotak (Deceased ) through and Ors. Vs Narendra Bhalchandra Mantri and Ors.

Hafiz Pharoah (Percy)Basta and Anr. Vs Dolly Jindal and Anr.

Vinod Ramdarsh Vishwakarma Vs Sarita Vinod Vishwakarma

Pushpalata Ramdas Naik Vs Chandrabhan Rangnath Raut

Perviz K Anita Vs Mr Dinshaw Rusi Mehta and Others