Disposed

Uco Bank, Throgh Its Chief Manager and Authorized Officer, Nagpur v. New Age False Ceiling Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Directors, Manoj Shashiprakash Gupta and Others

Bombay HC13 Oct 2023WP/6909/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition wherein the petitioner UCO Bank complained about the non-decision on an application challenging the plaint's jurisdiction under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The court permitted the petitioner to refile the application for expeditious hearing and directed the trial court to consider it accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Permitted petitioner to move an application for expeditious decision on the pending application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and directed the trial court to consider it.

Uco Bank, Throgh Its Chief Manager and… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-NAG:15118-DB

¶2

1 11-WP-6909-2023.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 6909 OF 2023

¶5

(UCO Bank, through its Chief Manager and Authorized Officer Vs. New Age False Ceiling Pvt. Ltd.,
through its Directors & Ors.)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Shri Yash Bhelande, Counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2023

¶9

The petitioner is the defendant in Regular Civil Suit No. 258/2023 that
has been filed by the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that an
order of status-quo has been passed on 4/2/2023 which continues to operate
even today. The petitioner has moved an application under the provisions of
Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking rejection of the
plaint on the ground of jurisdiction. It is urged that though this application was
moved on 8/3/2023, the same has not yet been considered.

¶10

2]In these facts, the petitioner is permitted to move an application for
seeking expeditious decision on the application below Exh.15 that has been filed
under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. If such
an application is moved, the trial Court shall consider the same in accordance
with law. Needless to state that if the petitioner is not satisfied with the outcome
of that application, it is free to take legal recourse in accordance with law.
3]The Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶11

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)

¶12

 (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶13

SUMIT

Uco Bank, Throgh Its Chief Manager and Authorized Officer, Nagpur v. New Age False Ceiling Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Directors, Manoj Shashiprakash Gupta and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uco Bank, Throgh Its Chief Manager and Authorized Officer, Nagpur v. New Age False Ceiling Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Directors, Manoj Shashiprakash Gupta and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rashtrasant Tukadoji Shikshan Sanstha, Neri, Chandrapur Thr. President, Suresh Dagoji Pise and Anr. Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Education (Higher Secondary), Mumbai and Ors.

Arun S/O Nagorao Gajbhiye Vs the State Cooperative Election Authority, Pune Thr. Its Secretary and Others

Sharad Namdeo Mandhare Vs Smt Archana Mende the Chief Officer, Nagar Parishad, Umred, Nagpur and Ors.

Rohini D/O Dewaji Kapgate Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Public Health, Mumba and Others

M/S. Ankit Construction, Thr. Partner, Shri. Kishor Kanhere Vs State of Maha., Thr. Its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Ganesh Nagorao Jumde and Others Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and Others