Disposed

Shaikh Mohd Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC28 Mar 2023WP/687/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition challenging an order of the Additional Sessions Judge. The court held that the existing directive in a prior writ petition regarding the hard disk and report was sufficient, rendering a fresh order unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of without passing a fresh order as the previous direction was found sufficient.

Shaikh Mohd Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

83-wp687-2023.doc

¶2

VRJ

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.687 OF 2023

¶5

Shaikh Mohd. Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed… Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.… Respondents

¶6

Mr. Pandit Kasar for the petitioner.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the respondent No.1/State.

¶7

Mr. Sachin Gaikwad, PI, Bhiwandi Crime.

¶8

CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:MARCH 28, 2023

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1.The applicant is challenging order dated 11th January 2023
passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case
No.654 of 2022. The report prayed in prayer clause (b) is subject
matter of order of this Court dated 13th September 2022 in a
Criminal Writ Petition No.3110 of 2022. This Court in paragraph 7
directed as under:

¶11

“7.…… As far as hard disk is concerned as and when
forensic laboratory report is received, the Investigating
Officer shall produce hard disk and report before the
concerned Court and thereafter, the request for providing
hard disk and the report may be granted by the concerned
Court. The Court of learned JMFC may proceed with
committal of case to the Court of Sessions.”

¶12

¶13